docs(runtime): define first conforming product plan
This commit is contained in:
parent
4bb8efe375
commit
3330ca55cd
@ -332,7 +332,89 @@ Current product expectations:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 13. Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
## 13. First Conforming Implementation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
The first conforming implementations for Phase 5 should be treated as two tracks:
|
||||
|
||||
### Track A: Cowork conformance
|
||||
|
||||
Goal:
|
||||
|
||||
- present Cowork as the reference high-autonomy runtime producer
|
||||
|
||||
Required external contract surface:
|
||||
|
||||
- `AgentSession`
|
||||
- `AgentTask`
|
||||
- `AgentTodo`
|
||||
- `AgentRun`
|
||||
- `AgentApprovalCheckpoint`
|
||||
- `AgentActionLog`
|
||||
- dispatch validation
|
||||
- checkpoint/resume narrative support
|
||||
|
||||
Current state:
|
||||
|
||||
- sessions, tasks, runs, approvals, actions, and dispatch validation are already exposed through
|
||||
`cowork-service`
|
||||
- todos are currently task-backed
|
||||
- replay anchors now use canonical Rust audit `event_id`
|
||||
|
||||
Next conforming steps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. add a first-class Cowork todo/checklist source or make the task-backed mapping an explicit long-term choice
|
||||
2. expose checkpoint metadata or equivalent persisted resume summaries through product-facing runtime surfaces
|
||||
3. preserve canonical event IDs anywhere approval/audit state crosses service boundaries
|
||||
4. document which Cowork transitions are direct observations versus projections derived by `cowork-service`
|
||||
|
||||
Conformance bar:
|
||||
|
||||
- a reviewer can inspect one Cowork session and understand queued, running, paused, waiting-approval,
|
||||
resumed, and completed states without reading Rust internals
|
||||
|
||||
### Track B: FlowMonk conformance
|
||||
|
||||
Goal:
|
||||
|
||||
- present FlowMonk as the reference scheduled/queued runtime producer
|
||||
|
||||
Required external contract surface:
|
||||
|
||||
- `AgentSession`
|
||||
- `AgentTask`
|
||||
- `AgentTodo`
|
||||
- `AgentRun`
|
||||
- `AgentApprovalCheckpoint`
|
||||
- `AgentActionLog`
|
||||
- dispatch validation where scheduling hands off into downstream execution
|
||||
- checkpoint/resume narrative for planning state
|
||||
|
||||
Current state:
|
||||
|
||||
- sessions, tasks, todos, runs, approvals, actions, and dispatch validation are exposed through the backend
|
||||
- approvals are derived from agent-suggested schedule entries
|
||||
- todos are derived from the planning backlog
|
||||
|
||||
Next conforming steps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. decide whether approvals remain derived or become a first-class product primitive
|
||||
2. decide whether backlog tasks are the permanent todo model or whether a distinct checklist model will exist
|
||||
3. expose checkpoint summaries for planning sessions so resume state is not inferred only from final records
|
||||
4. document the exact rule for when a scheduled entry becomes a new run under an existing session
|
||||
|
||||
Conformance bar:
|
||||
|
||||
- a reviewer can inspect one FlowMonk planning session and understand which work was queued,
|
||||
confirmed, executed, deferred, or resumed without guessing from schedule records alone
|
||||
|
||||
Shared closeout requirement:
|
||||
|
||||
- both products should publish a short product-local adoption note that maps their native entities to
|
||||
the shared runtime contract and explicitly names any remaining derived projections
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 14. Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
1. A dispatched Cowork task can be resumed after interruption without losing audit continuity.
|
||||
2. A FlowMonk execution can emit task/todo state using the same contract.
|
||||
@ -342,7 +424,7 @@ Current product expectations:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 14. Implementation Checklist
|
||||
## 15. Implementation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] finalize entity list and minimum required fields
|
||||
- [x] define run vs session vs task boundaries
|
||||
@ -350,7 +432,7 @@ Current product expectations:
|
||||
- [x] define dispatch payload contract
|
||||
- [x] define action-log hook points
|
||||
- [x] define ActionTrail replay requirements
|
||||
- [ ] define first conforming implementation plan for Cowork and FlowMonk
|
||||
- [x] define first conforming implementation plan for Cowork and FlowMonk
|
||||
|
||||
Commits:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -272,7 +272,8 @@ These should be resolved before claiming the ecosystem docs are fully implementa
|
||||
|
||||
- Cowork: add `AgentTodo` direct projection once the product exposes first-class todo entities.
|
||||
- FlowMonk: replace the current derived approval/todo projections once the product exposes first-class approval/todo primitives.
|
||||
- Shared runtime: define the first conforming implementation plan for Cowork and FlowMonk beyond the current baseline projections.
|
||||
- Cowork: expose product-facing checkpoint summaries for resume review.
|
||||
- FlowMonk: expose product-facing checkpoint summaries and document the run/session rollover rule.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.2 Explicit Blockers And Questions
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -112,7 +112,11 @@ Observed baseline:
|
||||
|
||||
- Cowork now emits shared runtime projections from cowork-service, preserves Rust-side canonical event IDs on approval/audit records, and still lacks a first-class native `AgentTodo` product source behind the current task-backed projection.
|
||||
- FlowMonk now emits direct runtime projections for planning sessions, tasks, todos, runs, approvals, and action logs, but it still lacks distinct native checklist and approval entities behind those projections.
|
||||
- the first conforming implementation plan still needs to be made explicit for Cowork and FlowMonk beyond the current baseline projections.
|
||||
- the conforming implementation plan is now explicit in the runtime contract, but the product-level follow-through still remains:
|
||||
- Cowork needs a first-class todo source or an explicit decision to keep the task-backed mapping
|
||||
- Cowork needs product-facing checkpoint summaries
|
||||
- FlowMonk needs an explicit decision on whether approvals/todos stay derived or become first-class primitives
|
||||
- FlowMonk needs product-facing checkpoint summaries and a documented run/session rollover rule
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Explicit Blockers And Questions
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -34,9 +34,22 @@ ActionTrail now treats the exported JSON audit shape as the canonical import inp
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Remaining Follow-Up
|
||||
## 3. Runtime Conformance Follow-Up
|
||||
|
||||
For Phase 5, Cowork is also a first conforming runtime implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Current runtime adoption state:
|
||||
|
||||
- shared runtime projections now exist through `cowork-service`
|
||||
- audit/action surfaces preserve canonical Rust `event_id`
|
||||
- approvals and action logs can participate in ActionTrail replay
|
||||
- todos are still derived from orchestrator tasks
|
||||
|
||||
Remaining follow-up:
|
||||
|
||||
- add an explicit product-local helper for exporting ecosystem-ready audit payloads
|
||||
- decide whether task-backed todo projection is temporary or permanent
|
||||
- expose product-facing checkpoint summaries for resume review
|
||||
- optionally emit canonical runtime events alongside the current local audit logs
|
||||
- add signed dispatch or upload flow from Cowork desktop into ActionTrail when runtime integration is prioritized
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
# Adoption: learning_ai_flowmonk
|
||||
|
||||
> **Status:** Phase 2 baseline implemented
|
||||
> **Status:** Phase 2 baseline implemented, Phase 5 runtime baseline implemented
|
||||
> **Owner:** `learning_ai_flowmonk`
|
||||
> **Ecosystem focus:** plan -> routine -> habit golden flow
|
||||
> **Ecosystem focus:** plan -> routine -> habit golden flow and scheduled runtime projection
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
|
||||
- emit canonical `plan` artifacts from planning-export data
|
||||
- emit canonical `artifact.created` events for plans
|
||||
- provide enough lineage for ChronoMind and EffoRise consumers
|
||||
- expose FlowMonk planning/runtime state through the shared runtime contract
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
@ -18,7 +19,14 @@
|
||||
- [x] emit `artifact.created` for the plan artifact
|
||||
- [x] include correlation/session IDs for downstream linking
|
||||
- [x] persist latest plan indexes for downstream consumers
|
||||
- [x] expose direct runtime sessions, tasks, todos, runs, approvals, and actions
|
||||
- [ ] decide whether approvals remain derived or become first-class primitives
|
||||
- [ ] decide whether todos remain backlog-task projections or become a first-class checklist primitive
|
||||
- [ ] expose product-facing checkpoint summaries for planning-session resume
|
||||
- [ ] document the rule for when a scheduled entry becomes a new run under an existing session
|
||||
|
||||
Commits:
|
||||
|
||||
- `59ab8b1` implemented the Phase 2 producer path
|
||||
- `1ccafa7` implemented direct runtime sessions, tasks, runs, actions, and dispatch validation
|
||||
- `faf93ec` implemented direct runtime approvals and todos
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user