Self-contained brief that any coding agent (Codex, Claude, Gemini, etc.)
running on this machine can paste in to resume the redesign+audit work.
Covers, in order:
- Required reads (the 4 source-of-truth docs in both repos)
- Environment setup (source ~/.zshrc for GITEA_NPM_TOKEN)
- Verification gates per repo (must run before AND after every change)
- 12-item priority queue with effort estimates, top to bottom
- Commit conventions (subject `<type>(<id>):`, audit-doc tick, model
Co-Authored-By line)
- Six explicit "do not" rules (don't commit incidental lockfile
regens, don't touch nomgap WIP, don't skip gates, don't bulk-fix
platform lint, don't push --force, etc.)
- When-to-stop-and-ask criteria so the agent doesn't guess on
ambiguous specs or break public API surfaces
Bottom of the file has a short copy-paste prompt that points back at
this doc, so the human just pastes 7 lines into Codex and the agent
self-bootstraps from the full brief.
Refs: docs/HANDOVER.md, docs/AUDIT_REDESIGN.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.4 KiB
Codex Resume Prompt — Trading Web Redesign + Cross-Workspace Audit
Paste the contents of this file into a fresh Codex / Claude / Gemini agent
session running on the same machine that did the original work
(Sar-M2-bl, user saravana). The agent will pick up where the previous
session left off and drive toward 100% completion of the audit backlog plus
opportunistic improvements.
The short "copy-paste" version of this prompt lives at the bottom of this file. The long version is the full agent brief — the short one tells the agent to read the long one.
── BEGIN AGENT BRIEF ──
You are resuming an in-progress audit + redesign across two sibling repos on this machine. Two prior sessions already shipped the foundational work and the audit. Your job is to drive the open audit items to ✅ done with high-quality, no-regression commits. Do not start over. Do not skip the verification gates.
Step 0 — Required reads (do this BEFORE writing any code)
Read these four files in order. They are the source of truth — anything contradicting them is wrong:
/Users/saravana/BytelystAI/trading/learning_ai_invt_trdg/docs/HANDOVER.md/Users/saravana/BytelystAI/trading/learning_ai_invt_trdg/docs/AUDIT_REDESIGN.md/Users/saravana/BytelystAI/learning_ai/learning_ai_common_plat/docs/HANDOVER.md/Users/saravana/BytelystAI/learning_ai/learning_ai_common_plat/docs/AUDIT_PLATFORM.md
After reading, summarise in your own words: which items are ✅ done, which are 🟦 in progress, which are ⬜ open, and which one you are about to attempt. If your summary disagrees with the audit doc tables, re-read.
Step 1 — Environment
This machine has the private-registry token in ~/.zshrc. Every shell you
spawn must source ~/.zshrc before running pnpm. Without it pnpm
prints WARN: Failed to replace env in config: ${GITEA_NPM_TOKEN} and the
install will fail on private @bytelyst/* packages.
source ~/.zshrc # gets GITEA_NPM_TOKEN onto your shell
echo "$GITEA_NPM_TOKEN" | wc -c # should print 41 (40 chars + newline)
Step 2 — Verification gates (run BEFORE and AFTER every change)
You MUST run the appropriate gate before claiming any item is ✅ done. If a gate fails after your change, you broke something — fix it before committing. Do NOT --no-verify. Do NOT skip hooks.
Trading repo gates (cd /Users/saravana/BytelystAI/trading/learning_ai_invt_trdg):
npm --prefix web run typecheck # → exit 0
npm --prefix web run build # → ✓ built
npm --prefix web test # → 151+ pass / ≤4 known fails
npx tsc --noEmit -p backend/tsconfig.json # → exit 0
Platform repo gates (cd /Users/saravana/BytelystAI/learning_ai/learning_ai_common_plat):
source ~/.zshrc
pnpm typecheck # → exit 0
pnpm test # → ~2,200 pass
pnpm lint > /tmp/lint.log 2>&1 # at the start: 85 pre-existing
# errors. After your fix: count
# MUST go down, not up.
The 4 known trading test failures are documented as audit items F7+F8. They are NOT regressions. If you see >4 failures, you regressed.
Step 3 — Priority queue (work top-down)
These are ordered for highest-value-per-hour. Pick one, finish it, commit, push, tick the audit doc, then move to the next. Do not parallelise unrelated buckets.
| # | Repo | Item | What to do | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | trading | E2 | Regen root pnpm-lock.yaml so CI sees react-router-dom, @monaco-editor/react, @dnd-kit/* |
5 min |
| 2 | trading | F7+F8 | Fix the 4 pre-existing test failures (useTabFeatureFlags cache + EntryForm alert) |
1-2 hr |
| 3 | trading | B1 | Build RSI/MACD/Bollinger overlay toggles in web/src/views/HomeView.tsx's StockChart |
2-3 hr |
| 4 | trading | B2+B3 | Wire ★ Watchlist + 🔔 buttons in TickerHeader; pull company name from fetchResearchProfile |
1-2 hr |
| 5 | trading | C2 | Add in-memory FMP cache (30-min TTL, key by full URL) — free tier is 250 req/day | 1-2 hr |
| 6 | trading | F6 | Tests for the 7 new backend endpoints (chart/bars, news, indices, research×3, screener) | 2-3 hr |
| 7 | trading | C1 | Sandbox or refuse strategyConfig.type === 'code' in /api/backtest/run. Currently no handler. |
4-6 hr |
| 8 | trading | B6 | Make CodeStrategyEditor "Save" actually persist via createTradeProfile (not just localStorage) |
1 hr |
| 9 | trading | D1 | Skeleton loaders for News, ResearchCards, Screener (replace plain "Loading…" text) | 1-2 hr |
| 10 | trading | D5 | Responsive layout: collapse sidebar + hide right panel under 1024 px | 3-4 hr |
| 11 | platform | P-sweep | Per-package pnpm --filter <pkg> lint:fix for the 85 surfaced errors. ONE COMMIT PER PACKAGE. |
2-4 hr |
| 12 | trading | G1-G4 | Mobile parity: news/research/screener tabs in Expo app. Code editor stays web-only. | days |
For each item the full description + acceptance criteria is in the corresponding audit doc row. Do not invent your own scope.
Step 4 — Commit conventions
The previous sessions used these conventions. Match them exactly so the audit history stays grep-able.
- One audit item (or one bucket of related items) per commit.
- Subject line:
<type>(<id>): short description— e.g.fix(B1): wire RSI/MACD/Bollinger overlay toggles,test(F6): add coverage for /api/chart/bars,chore(P-sweep): pnpm --filter @bytelyst/auth lint:fix. - Body explains the WHY in present-tense prose, not a bullet list of files.
Reference audit IDs at the bottom:
Refs: docs/AUDIT_REDESIGN.md item B1. - End with
Co-Authored-By: <model> <noreply@anthropic.com>(use your actual model name). - After committing, edit the audit doc table row: change
⬜→✅and put the short commit hash in the "Fix commit" column.
Step 5 — Things to NEVER do
- Do not commit
pnpm-lock.yamlregenerated as a side effect. If your work changes deps, mention it in the commit body and let the reviewer decide. The platform repo currently has a +2.9k/-8.5k lockfile diff sitting in the working tree from the prior session — leave it alone unless you specifically own it. - Do not touch the nomgap WIP files in the platform repo
(
docker-compose.ecosystem.yml,products/nomgap/product.json,services/platform-service/src/modules/flags/seed.ts). They belong to another contributor's in-progress migration. - Do not refactor unrelated code because you "noticed it while nearby". Open a new audit row instead and let the human prioritise.
- Do not skip verification gates. "TypeScript passes locally" is not verification — running the gate command and seeing exit 0 is.
- Do not bulk-fix the 85 platform lint errors in one commit. Each package needs eyeball review (the autofixer can remove unused exports that are public API). One package = one commit.
- Do not push --force to main. Backups exist
(
backup/main-20260504-061739in trading,backup/main-20260504-062733in platform) but rewriting public main history is still the wrong move.
Step 6 — When you finish a chunk
After each commit + push:
- Run the verification gates again (yes, again — the push hooks may have reformatted files).
- Update the audit doc row.
- Briefly tell the human: which item ID, which commit hash, what gate output you saw. Three sentences max.
If you complete an entire bucket (all rows ✅), open a new section in the audit doc called "Bucket X — closed" with a one-paragraph retrospective (what was harder than expected, what surfaced as follow-up work).
Step 7 — When to stop and ask
Stop and ask the human, do not guess, when:
- An audit item's acceptance criteria is ambiguous and the existing code has no precedent.
- A fix would change a public API surface (exported function signature, endpoint contract, schema field).
- A gate fails and the failure is in code you didn't write and have no context for.
- You have closed everything in your priority slice and want to know what to pick up next.
Otherwise: keep going. The point of this brief is so you don't have to ping the human every 10 minutes.
── END AGENT BRIEF ──
Short copy-paste prompt for Codex
Paste this single block into Codex / Claude / Gemini:
Resume the trading-redesign + platform-audit work on this machine. Read
/Users/saravana/BytelystAI/trading/learning_ai_invt_trdg/docs/CODEX_RESUME_PROMPT.md
in full first — it contains your full brief, the priority queue, the
verification gates, and the commit conventions. Then start at the top of
the priority queue (item E2, regen the root pnpm-lock.yaml) and work
down, one commit per audit item, ticking the audit doc as you go.
Source ~/.zshrc in every shell so GITEA_NPM_TOKEN is available. Do not
skip verification gates. Do not touch the nomgap WIP files. When done
with a chunk, push and tell me the commit hash + gate output in three
sentences.